Оценка статической трещиностойкости полимерных материалов для изготовления базисов съемных протезов
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2019-2-102Keywords:
полимерные материалы, съемные протезы, акустическая эмиссия, трехточечный изгиб, квазистатическое растяжениеAbstract
Resume. The intensity of scientific research in the field of new basic polymer materials shows both the importance and the complexity of creating a high-strength, convenient, cheap material for dentistry without significant technological changes. However, a number of studies on biodestruction of basic plastics, studying the mechanical strength of their samples do not affect the problems and causes of origin, the spread of cracks in the thickness of the prosthesis, resulting in its destruction. Therefore, the development of a technique for determining the origin of cracks in basic materials is important in lengthening the operational properties of removable prostheses.
The goal. Comparative evaluation of material static crack resistance for removable dentures bases and the destruction of polymers by the tensile method according to the scheme of three-point bending by a quasi-static load. We investigated the destruction of samples during quasi-static tensile of three types of materials: «Ftoraks» (JSC «CTOMA», Ukraine), «Villacryl H Plus» (Zhermack, Italy), «Vertex™ ThermoSens» (Vertex Dental, Netherlands) using acoustic emission method.
Results. According to research results, all polymers were destroyed in a linearly elastic way. The largest AE activity was observed during the stretching of the «Ftoraks» polymer samples, and the smallest – «Villacryl H Plus». Achievement of the load of destruction in different materials requires different times: the largest amount of time for «Vertex™ TermoSens» polymer, the least – for «Ftoraks».
Conclusions. Comparative evaluation of samples showed that, according to experimental data, materials for bases of removable dentures on the ability to resist cracking (first appearance of AE signals) can be divided in this order (from the most durable to the weakest): «Villacryl H Plus», «Vertex™ TermoSens», «Ftoraks», and
bymacro-indicator of viscosity fracture КІС – «Vertex™ TermoSens», «Ftoraks», «Villacryl H Plus».
Key words: polymeric materials, removable dentures, acoustic emission, three-point bending, quasi-static tensile.
Downloads
References
sovremennykh tekhnolohyi stomatolohycheskoho ortopedycheskoho lechenyia patsyentov
po dannym anketyrovanyia vrachei. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prykladnykh y fundamentalnykh
yssledovanyi. – 2014. № 2. S. 52–55 [in Russiаn]
2. Klinichne obgruntuvannia udoskonalenoho ortopedychnoho likuvannia patsiientiv z
poiednanniam povnoi ta chastkovoi vtraty zubiv. Nespriadko VP, Baranovskyi OV, Tykhonov DO.
Visnyk problem biolohii y medytsyny. – 2013. № 2 (100). S. 38-40 [in Ukrainian]
3. Shcherba PV. Perekryvaiushchye protezy: ystorycheskye aspekty i sovremennye
tendentsii. Sovremennaia stomatologyia. – 2003. № 1. S. 93-96 [in Ukrainian]
4. Bida VI, Klochan SM. Zamishchennia defektiv zubnykh riadiv suchasnymy konstruktsiyamy
znimnykh proteziv. Navchalnyi posibnyk. – Kyiv. – 2008. 220 s. [in Ukrainian]
5. Kuz VS, Dvornyk VM, Kuz HM. Vykorystannia suchasnykh bezakrylovykh bazysnykh
materialiv u klinitsi ortopedychnoi stomatologii. Ukrainskyi stomatologichnyi almanakh. –
2016. № 3. T. 2, S. 40–45 [in Ukrainian]
6. In vitro evaluation of the influence of repairing condition of denture base resin on
the bonding of autopolymerizing resins. Minami H, Suzuki S, Minesaky Y [et al.]. J. Prosthet
Dent. – 2004. Vol. 91, P. 164–170
7. Kuz VS, Dvornyk VM, Kuz HM. Kharakterystyka suchasnykh bazysnykh stomatologichnykh
materialiv ta yikh vplyv na tkanyny porozhnyny rota. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi
medytsyny: Visnyk Ukrainskoi medychnoш stomatologichnоi akademiyi. – 2015. T. 14,
Vypusk 2 (46). S. 179–184 [in Ukrainian]
8. Nidzelskyi MYa. Mekhanizmy adaptatsii do zubnykh proteziv. – Poltava, 2003.
115 s. [in Ukrainian]
9. Goldberg M. In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components.
A Review. Clin Oral Investig. 2008. Vol. 12, P. 1–8
10. Ostroholov DF. Analyz prychyn polomky syemnykh plastynochnykh zubnykh
protezov y ykh klynycheskaia traktovka. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi medytsyny: Visnyk
Ukrainskoi medychnoi stomatologichnoi akademii. – 2007. T. 7, Vyp. 4 (20). S. 45–46
[in Ukrainian]
11. Profilaktychni zakhody pry korystuvanni znimnymy plastynkovymy protezamy.
Leontovych IO, Korol DM, Odzhubeiska OD [ta in.]. Ukrainskyi stomatologichnyi almanakh. –
2013. № 2. S. 90–93 [in Ukrainian]
12. Aamer AS, Hasan F, Hameed A. Biological degradation of plastics: A comprehensive
review. Biotechnol. Adv. – 2008. Vol. 26, P. 246–265
13. Hoffman U, Yanar A, Bolinger A. The frequency histogram ‒ A new method for
the evalution of Laser Doppler Flux Motion. Microvascul. Res. – 1990. Vol. 40, P. 293– 301.
14. Arutiunov SD, Afanaseva VV, Stepanov AH, Hrachev DY. Klynycheskoe pry -
menenye usovershenstvovannoi metodyky restavratsyy syomnykh plastynochnykh protezov
posle polomky. Sovremennye problemy nauky y obrazovanyia. – 2016. № 1. S. 26
[in Russiаn]
15. Chitchumnongl P, Brooks SC. Comparison of three- and four-point flexural
strength testing of denture-base polymers. Dental Materials. – 1989. V. 5, № 1. P. 2–5.
16. Zappini G, Kammann A, Wachter W. Comparison of fracture tests of denture base
materials // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 2003. Vol. 90, № 6. P. 578–585
17. HOST 25.506-85. Raschety i ispytanyia na prochnost. Metody mekhanycheskykh
ispytanyi metallov. Opredelenye kharakterystyk treshchynostoikosty (viazkosty razrushenyia)
pry statycheskom nagruzhenyi. Vved. v deistvye 27.03.1985 h. – M.: Izd-vo standartov. –
1985. 60 s. ГОСТ 25.506-85 [in Russiаn]
18. Portatyvna systema SKOP-8M dlia vymiriuvannia ta analizu sygnaliv akustychnoi
emisii. VR Skalskyi, BP Klym, RM Plakhtii ta in. Nauka ta innovatsii. – 2010. 6. № 3. S. 20–29
[in Ukrainian]
19. Pestrykov VM, Morozov EM. Mekhanyka razrushenyia tverdykh tel. – Pb.: Professyia,
– 2002. 320 s. [in Russiаn]