Evaluation of brittleness of restorative materials of light polymerization based on the analysis of signals obtained by acoustic emission method

Authors

  • V. S. Kukhta Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University
  • N. O. Mykyievych Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2024-1-5

Keywords:

composite materials, strength, elasticity, pressure, destruction, acoustic emission

Abstract

Topicality. A large number of light polymerization materials used in dentistry for the restoration of both anterior and canine teeth due to their aesthetic and mechanical properties determine the relevance of their comparative studies. Any restorative dental material, similarly to natural teeth, must possess sufficient mechanical durability in order to function in the oral cavity over an extensive period of time. In view of this, investigation of mechanical properties of such materials is the clinical task of paramount importance.

The objective of the research is to analyse strength characteristics and features of destructive processes of lighthardening composite materials under three-point pressure with the application of the acoustic emission method (AE).

Materials and methods. Samples were made from composite filling materials Latelux, Tetric N-Ceram, Charisma Classic, Filtek Z250, which were afterwards pressed until their complete destruction on the CBP-5 machine. In the process of fracture initiation and development signals were recorded by a portable eight-channel SKOP-8M measuring system. Flexural strength and elastic modulus were determined, in addition to dynamics of material fracture being studied by the acoustic emission method.

Results. It has been established that the nature of the destruction of Latelux, Tetric N-Ceram and Charisma Classic materials is elastic and plastic at the initial stage of pressure, with the transition to brittle during its further growth, whereas the destruction of the Filtek Z250 material is brittle.

Conclusion. The signals accompanying the destruction of the Tetric N-Ceram composite appear to have the highest amplitude and energy, while those accompanying the destruction of Latelux demonstrate the lowest amplitude and energy. Tetric N-Ceram nanohybrid composite shows the highest resistance to destruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

V. S. Kukhta, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head. Department of Orthopedic Dentistry of Danylo Halytsky LNMU. Lviv, Ukraine
E-mail: viktor.kukhta@gmail.com

N. O. Mykyievych, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University

Intern at Danylo Halytskyi Lviv National Medical University. Lviv, Ukraine
E-mail: mykych08@gmail.com

References

Benetti AR, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A, Flury S. Resin composites: Modulus of elasticity and marginal quality. Journal of Dentistry. 2014; 42: 1185–1192.

Cho NY, Ferracane JL, Lee IB. Acoustic emission analysis of tooth-composite interfacial debonding. Joural of Dental Research. 2013; 92(1): 76–81.

Ereifej NS, Oweis YG, Altarawneh SK. Fracture of fiber-reinforced composites analyzed via acoustic emission. Dental Materials Journal. 2015; 34(4): 417–424.

Erhardt MCG, Goulart M, Jacques RC, Rodrigues JA, Pfeifer CS. Effect of different composite modulation protocols on the conversion and polymerization stress profile of bulk-filled resin restorations. Dental Materials. 2020; 36(7): 829–837.

Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2009; 13: 427–438.

ISO 4049:2019. Dentistry - Polymer-based restorative materials. ISO/TC 106/SC 1 Filling and restorative materials. 05.2019. Version 5.36 p.

Kim RJ-Y, Kim Y-J, Choi N-S, Li I-B. Polymerization shrinkage, modulus, and shrinkage stress related to tooth-restoration debonding composites of Dentistry. 430–439.

Li H, Li J, Liu X, Fok A. Non-destructive examination of interfacial debonding in dental composite restorations using acoustic emission. Composites and Their Applications. InTech, 2012. Ch.7: 147–168.

Park J-H, Gu J-U, Choi N-S. Acoustic emission characteristics of methacrylate-based composite and silorane-based composite during dental restoration according to a variety of C-factor. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2017; 31(9): 4067–4072.

Skal’s’kii VR, Makeev VF, Stankevich OM, Kyrmanov OS, Vynnyts’ka SI, Opanasovich V K. Strength evaluation of stomatologic polymers by wavelet transform of acoustic emission signals. Strength of materials. 2015; 47(4): 566–572.

Skalskyi V, Nazarchuk Z, Stankevych O. Acoustic emission. Fracture Detection in Structural Materials. Springer Cham, 2022.XIII, 218 p.

Yang B, Guo J, Huang Q, Heo Y, Fox A, Wang Y. Acoustic properties of interfacial debonding and their relationship with shrinkage stress in Class-I restorations. Dental Materials. 2016. 32: 742–748.

Yanishen IV, Tkachenko IM, Skrypnikov PM, Hasiuk PA. Wear resistance of dental materials which are used for anterior teeth restorations. Wiadomosci Lekarskie. 2020; 73(8): 1677–1681.

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Kukhta В. С., & Mykyievych Н. О. (2024). Evaluation of brittleness of restorative materials of light polymerization based on the analysis of signals obtained by acoustic emission method. Actual Dentistry, (1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2024-1-5

Issue

Section

PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY