The use of CBCT of the skull in orthodontics (Review article)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2024-1-91Keywords:
cone-beam computed tomography, CBCT, orthodontics, diagnosis, canine retention, repid palatal expiation (RME), temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ), occlusion, articulator, treatment planning, treatment outcamesAbstract
Actuality. Diagnostics in orthodontics is one of the most important stages because the establishment of the final diagnosis and the choice of treatment methods directly depend on it. According to the diagnostic protocols of orthodontic patients, CBCT is currently not the gold standard, and is the method of choice.
The goal is to analyze the available publications on the study of indications for CBCT and the impact of the information obtained on the choice of treatment method and/or control of the treatment.
Materials and methods. Retrospective analysis of available publications on the resources https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/ and https://www.sciencedirect.com/ and https://scholar.google.com/ and the formation of categories of indications for conducting CBCT in orthodontic practice and possible development trends in diagnostics based on CBCT The results. More than 200 publications were analyzed and 82 published in scientific publications in the period from 1998 to 2023 were selected, and the obtained data were systematized into the main groups of indications for conducting CBCT, namely:
(1) assessment of the volume of the alveolar process for planning the possibility of tooth movement;
(2) accurate determination of the localization of retained and overcomplete teeth;
(3) assessment of the degree of ossification of the palatine suture for choosing a method of maxillary expansion;
(4) study of angulation, morphology or root resorption;
(5) quantification of nonunion defects of the lip and palate;
(6) evaluation of the selection of TADs sizes and optimal areas for their installation;
(7) help in determining the possible etiological factors of the occurrence of a pathological bite, for example, anomalies of the TMJ.
Conclusions. The development of technologies and diagnostics of patients does not stand still, including 3D technologies in orthodontics as well, and the information that the doctor receives from CBCT influences the choice of treatment method and the evaluation of the conducted, which helps to improve the provision of orthodontic care and treatment, and we hope that in soon CBCT as a diagnostic method will take its place in diagnostic protocols and replace the gold standard, which is currently OPTG and TRG (cephalometry).
Downloads
References
Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/98032356 PMid:17586852
Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):550-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.046 PMid:17920510
Hasan A. A Comparsion Between Landmark Identification On 2D Frontal Radiograph and 3D rendered volumes From CBCT Scans. Tuj-hlth [Internet]. 2018 Sep.25 [cited 2023 May 4];39(4):33-44. Available from: http://journal.tishreen.edu.sy/index.php/hlthscnc/article/view/3962
Adams GL, Gansky SA, Miller AJ, Harrell WE Jr, Hatcher DC. Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry anda 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Oct;126(4):397-409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.023 PMid:15470343
Sun L, Zhang L, Shen G, Wang B, Fang B. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Mar;147(3):313-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.032 PMid:25726398
Wood R, Sun Z, Chaudhry J, Tee BC, Kim DG, Leblebicioglu B, England G. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Mar;143(3):353-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.019 PMid:23452969
Patcas R, Müller L, Ullrich O, Peltomäki T. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jan;141(1):41-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.034 PMid:22196184
Atik E, Akarsu-Guven B, Kocadereli I, Ciger S. Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensional and inclination changes with selfligating and conventional brackets using broad archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jun;149(6):830-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.024 PMid:27241993
Corbridge JK, Campbell PM, Taylor R, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Transverse dentoalveolar changes after slow maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Sep;140(3):317-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.025 PMid:21889076
Pereira JDS, Jacob HB, Locks A, Brunetto M, Ribeiro GLU. Evaluation of the rapid and slow maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):61-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.061-068.oar PMid:28658357 PMCid:PMC5484271
Johnson DP. Effects of curve of Wilson correction and pre-treatment boundary conditions on quantitative changes in alveolar bone morphology. MSc thesis. University of Michigan School of Dentistry; 2011.
Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, Kim J, Taylor G. Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4): 428.e1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.052 PMid:17920493
Tai K, Hotokezaka H, Park JH, Tai H, Miyajima K, Choi M, Kai LM, Mishima K. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Sep;138(3): 262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.023 PMid:20816294
Tai K, Park JH. Dental and skeletal changes in the upper and lower jaws after treatment with Schwarz appliances using conebeam computed tomography. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Fall;35(1):111-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.35.1.b21t44rj34027603 PMid:21189775
Tai K, Park JH, Mishima K, Shin JW. 3-Dimensional cone-beam computed tomography analysis of transverse changes with Schwarz appliances on both jaws. Angle Orthod. 2011 Jul;81(4):670-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/110910-655.1 PMid:21406000 PMCid:PMC8919744
Izadikhah I, Cao D, Zhao Z, Yan B. Different Management Approaches in Impacted Maxillary Canines: An Overview on Current Trends and Literature. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Mar 1;21(3):326-36. PMID: 32434983. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2788
Hamada Y, Timothius CJC, Shin D, John V. Canine impaction - A review of the prevalence, etiology, diagnosis and treatment. Semin Orthod [Internet]. 2019 Mar 14 [cited 2023 May 4];25(2):117-23. Available from: https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/handle/1805/22588 doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2019.05.002
Botticelli S, Verna C, Cattaneo PM, Heidmann J, Melsen B. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod [Internet]. 2011 Aug [cited 2023 May 4];33(4):344-9. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article/33/4/344/398731 doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq102 PMid:21131389
Eslami E, Barkhordar H, Abramovitch K, Kim J, Masoud MI. Cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography in visualization of maxillary impacted-canine localization: A systematic review of comparative studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Feb;151(2):248-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.018 PMid:28153153
Sawamura T, Minowa K, Nakamura M. Impacted teeth in the maxilla: usefulness of 3D Dental-CT for preoperative evaluation. Eur J Radiol. 2003 Sep;47(3):221-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00168-7 PMid:12927666
Kumar S, Mehrotra P, Bhagchandani J, Singh A, Garg A, Kumar S, Sharma A, Yadav H. Localization of impacted canines. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jan;9(1): ZE11-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/10529.5480 PMid:25738100 PMCid:PMC4347191
Doğramaci EJ, Sherriff M, Rossi-Fedele G, McDonald F. Location and severity of root resorption related to impacted maxillary canines: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation. Aust Orthod J. 2015 May;31(1):49-58. PMID: 26219147. https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-140
Almuhtaseb E, Mao J, Mahony D, Bader R, Zhang ZX. Three-dimensional localization of impacted canines and root resorption assessment using cone beam computed tomography. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2014 Jun;34(3):425-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-014-1295-z PMid:24939311
Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):93-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq034 PMid:21270321
Strbac GD, Foltin A, Gahleitner A, Bantleon HP, Watzek G, Bernhart T. The prevalence of root resorption of maxillary incisors caused by impacted maxillary canines. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17(2):553-64. doi: ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0738-9 PMid:22543896
Kapila S, Nervina JM. 3D Image-aided diagnosis and treatment of impacted and transposed teeth. In: Kapila S, ed. Cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics: indications, insights and innovations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014. p. 349-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118674888.ch16
Nervina JM, Kapila S. Assessment of root position and morphology by cone beam computed tomography. In: Kapila S, ed. Cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics: indications, insights and innovations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014. p. 317-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118674888.ch15
Sosars P, Jakobsone G, Neimane L, Mukans M. Comparative analysis of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computedtomography in treatment planning of palatally displaced canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 May;157(5):719-727. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.012 PMid:32354444
Pereira JDS, Jacob HB, Locks A, Brunetto M, Ribeiro GLU. Evaluation of the rapid and slow maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):61-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.061-068.oar PMid:28658357 PMCid:PMC5484271
Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, Kim J, Taylor G. Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4): 428.e1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.052 PMid:17920493
Habeeb M, Boucher N, Chung CH. Effects of rapid palatal expansion on the sagittal and vertical dimensions of the maxilla: a study on cephalograms derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Sep;144(3):398-403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.012 PMid:23992812
Woller JL, Kim KB, Behrents RG, Buschang PH. An assessment of the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion using cone beam computed tomography in growing children. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Jan-Feb;19(1):26-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.026-035.oar PMid:24713557 PMCid:PMC4299416
Kanomi R, Deguchi T, Kakuno E, Takano-Yamamoto T, Roberts WE. CBCT of skeletal changes following rapid maxillary expansion to increase arch-length with a development-dependent bonded or banded appliance. Angle Orthod. 2013 Sep;83(5):851-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/082012-669.1 PMid:23488528 PMCid:PMC8744536
Zandi M, Miresmaeili A, Heidari A. Short-term skeletal and dental changes following bone-borne versus tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;42(7):1190-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.02.007 PMid:24704281
Dakhno L, Vyshemyrska T, Flis P, Burlakov P. [Сomparative transversal evaluation of upper jaw following rapid maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition period. CBCT analysis]. Evaluation of the dynamics of the transversal dimensions of the upper jaw after rapid growth in the period of mixed dentition. Analysis of cone beam computed tomography. Georgian Med News [Internet]. 2021 Jul-Aug [cited 2023 May 3] ;(316-317):96-102. Available from: https://cdn.website-editor.net/480918712df344a4a77508d4cd7815ab/files/uploaded/V316-317_N7-8_July-August_2021.pdf PMID: 34511453. (Russian).
Christie KF, Boucher N, Chung CH. Effects of bonded rapid palatal expansion on the transverse dimensions of the maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4 Suppl): S79-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.024 PMid:20381765
Hudson, J. Michael. "Articulators in Orthodontics." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 141, no. 5, Elsevier BV, May 2012, pp. 528-29. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.009 PMid:22554738
Kraus CD, Campbell PM, Spears R, Taylor RW, Buschang PH. Bony adaptation after expansion with light-to-moderate continuous forces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):655-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.017 PMid:24785930
Abdelkarim A. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Dent J (Basel). 2019 Sep 2;7(3):89. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030089 PMid:31480667 PMCid:PMC6784482
Palomo JM, Valiathan M, Hans MG. 3D orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. In: Kapila S, ed. Cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics: indications, insights and innovations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014. p. 221-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118674888.ch11 PMid:24830902
Garcia-Figueroa MA, Raboud DW, Lam EW, Heo G, Major PW. Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):93-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.034 PMid:18617108
Van Elslande D, Heo G, Flores-Mir C, Carey J, Major PW. Accuracy of mesiodistal root angulation projected by conebeam computed tomographic panoramic-like images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4 Suppl):S94-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.028 PMid:20381767
Owens AM, Johal A. Near-end of treatment panoramic radiograph in the assessment of mesiodistal root angulation. Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):475-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/040107-161.1 PMid:18416620
Bouwens DG, Cevidanes L, Ludlow JB, Phillips C. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jan;139(1):126-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.016 PMid:21195286 PMCid:PMC3036614
Tong H, Enciso R, Van Elslande D, Major PW, Sameshima GT. A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jul;142(1):133-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.027 PMid:22748999
Van Elslande D, Heo G, Flores-Mir C, Carey J, Major PW. Accuracy of mesiodistal root angulation projected by conebeam computed tomographic panoramic-like images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4 Suppl): S94-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.028 PMid:20381767
Ye N, Jian F, Xue J, Wang S, Liao L, Huang W, Yang X, Zhou Y, Lai W, Li J, Wang J. Accuracy of in-vitro tooth volumetric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Dec;142(6):879-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.020 PMid:23195374
Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4 Suppl): S100-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.040 PMid:20381750
Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Nackaerts O; SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium; Willems G. Comparison of 6 conebeam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Sep;140(3): e129-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.03.021 PMid:21889061
Lima TF, Gamba TO, Zaia AA, Soares AJ. Evaluation of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of root resorption. Aust Dent J. 2016 Dec;61(4):425-431. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12407 PMid:26780040
Vieira HT, Vizzotto MB, da Silveira PF, Ar s NA, Corr a Travessas JA, da Silveira HLD. Diagnostic efficacy of different cone beam computed tomography scanning protocols in the detection of chemically simulated external root resorption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Sep;130(3):322-327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2020.03.046 PMid:32423729
Creanga AG, Geha H, Sankar V, Teixeira FB, McMahan CA, Noujeim M. Accuracy of digital periapical radiography and conebeam computed tomography in detecting external root resorption. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015 Sep;45(3):153-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.3.153 PMid:26389057 PMCid:PMC4574052
Deliga Schröder ÂG, Westphalen FH, Schröder JC, Fernandes Â, Westphalen VPD. Accuracy of Digital Periapical Radiography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Natural and Simulated External Root Resorption. J Endod. 2018 Jul;44(7):1151-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.03.011 PMid:29884337
Lund H, Gröndahl K, Hansen K, Gröndahl HG. Apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. A prospective study using cone beam CT. Angle Orthod. 2012 May;82(3):480-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/061311-390.1 PMid:21919826 PMCid:PMC8865834
Topkara A, Karaman AI, Kau CH. Apical root resorption caused by orthodontic forces: A brief review and a long-term observation. Eur J Dent. 2012 Oct;6(4):445-53. PMID: 23077427; PMCID: PMC3474562 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698986 PMid:23077427 PMCid:PMC3474562
Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Nackaerts O; SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium; Willems G. Comparison of 6 conebeam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Sep;140(3): e129-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.03.021 PMid:21889061
Antonarakis GS, Patel RN, Tompson B. Oral health-related quality of life in non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients: a systematic review. Community Dent Health. 2013 Sep;30(3):189-95. PMID: 24151795.
Leslie EJ, Marazita ML. Genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2013 Nov;163C (4):246-258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31381 PMid:24124047 PMCid:PMC3925974
Zhou W, Li W, Lin J, Liu D, Xie X, Zhang Z. Tooth lengths of the permanent upper incisors in patients with cleft lip and palate determined with cone beam computed tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013 Jan;50(1):88-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1597/11-182 PMid:22428573
Simões Holz I, Martinelli Carvalho R, Lauris JR, Lindauer SJ, Gamba Garib D. Permanent canine eruption into the alveolar cleft region after secondary alveolar bone grafting: Are there prediction factors for impaction? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2018 Nov [cited 2023 May 4];154(5):657-63. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889540618305766 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.016. PMid:30384936
Dissaux C, Bodin F, Grollemund B, Bridonneau T, Kauffmann I, Mattern JF, Bruant-Rodier C. Evaluation of success of alveolar cleft bone graft performed at 5 years versus 10 years of age. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Jan;44(1):21-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.09.003 PMid:26646636
Shirota T, Kurabayashi H, Ogura H, Seki K, Maki K, Shintani S. Analysis of bone volume using computer simulation system for secondary bone graft in alveolar cleft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Sep;39(9):904-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.04.050 PMid:20605410
Oberoi S, Nervina JM, Vargervik K. 3D imaging in diagnosis and treatment planning of craniofacial anomalies. In: Kapila S, ed. Cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics: indications, insights and innovations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014. p. 485-508. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118674888.ch23
Suomalainen A, Åberg T, Rautio J, Hurmerinta K. Cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of alveolar bone grafting in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod [Internet]. 2014 Oct [cited 2023 May 4];36(5):603-11. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article/36/5/603/405564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt105 PMid:24509615
Yatabe M, Natsumeda GM, Miranda F, Janson G, Garib D. Alveolar bone morphology of maxillary central incisors near grafted alveolar clefts after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Oct;152(4):501-8. e1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.01.029 PMid:28962735
Marquezan M, Osório A, Sant'Anna E, Souza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):767-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02228.x PMid:21635560
Wilmes B, Drescher D. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of miniimplants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;40(7):697-703. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.08.008 PMid:21458232
Bonangi R, Kamath G, Srivathsa HS, Babshet M. Utility of CBCT for the measurement of palatal bone thickness. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;119(3):196-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2018.02.009 PMid:29486242
Gracco A, Lombardo L, Cozzani M, Siciliani G. Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of palatal bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Sep;134(3):361-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.027 PMid:18774082
Chhatwani S, Rose-Zierau V, Haddad B, Almuzian M, Kirschneck C, Danesh G. Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of palatal bone height for insertion of orthodontic implants - a retrospective CBCT study. Head Face Med. 2019 Apr 1;15(1):9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0193-9 PMid:30935392 PMCid:PMC6442434
Cömert Kiliç S, Kiliç N, Sümbüllü MA. Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: cone beam computed tomography findings, clinical features, and correlations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2015 Oct [cited 2023 May 3];44(10):1268-74. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S090150271500257X doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.06.023 PMid:26194774
Talaat WM, Adel OI, Al Bayatti S. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders discovered incidentally during routine dental examination using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol OralRadiol. 2018 Mar;125(3):250-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.11.012 PMid:29274723
İlgüy D, İlgüy M, Fişekçioğlu E, Dölekoğlu S, Ersan N. Articular eminence inclination, height, and condyle morphology on cone beam computed tomography. ScientificWorldJournal [Internet]. 2014 Feb 13 [cited 2023 May 4]; 2014:761714. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/761714 PMid:24696193 PMCid:PMC3947926
Hunter A, Kalathingal S. Diagnostic imaging for temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain. Dent Clin North Am. 2013 Jul;57(3):405-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2013.04.008 PMid:23809300
Iskanderani D, Nilsson M, Alstergren P, Shi XQ, Hellen-Halme K. Evaluation of a low-dose protocol for cone beam computed tomography of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Sep 1;49(6):20190495. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190495 PMid:32250642 PMCid:PMC7461740
Hintze H, Wiese M, Wenzel A. Cone beam CT and conventional tomography for the detection of morphological temporomandibular joint changes. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007 May;36(4):192-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/25523853 PMid:17536085
Alkhader M, Ohbayashi N, Tetsumura A, Nakamura S, Okochi K, Momin MA, Kurabayashi T. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting osseous abnormalities of the temporomandibular joint and its correlation with cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Jul;39(5):270-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/25151578 PMid:20587650 PMCid:PMC3520245
Nah KS. Condylar bony changes in patients with temporomandibular disorders: a CBCT study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012 Dec;42(4):249-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2012.42.4.249 PMid:23301212 PMCid:PMC3534180
Shahidi S, Vojdani M, Paknahad M. Correlation between articular eminence steepness measured with cone-beam computed tomography and clinical dysfunction index in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jul;116(1):91-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.04.001 PMid:23768876
Koyama J, Nishiyama H, Hayashi T. Follow-up study of condylar bony changes using helical computed tomography in patients with temporomandibular disorder. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007 Dec;36(8):472-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/28078357 PMid:18033943
Dakhno L, Vyshemyrska T, Burlakov P, Storozhenko K, Flis P. Assessment of the feasibility of using cone-beam computed tomography in children for diagnostics, 3D cephalometry and planning orthodontic treatment (review). Georgian Med News. 2022 Feb;(323):54-60. PMID: 35271471. (Russian).
Scarfe WC, Azevedo B, Toghyani S, Farman AG. Cone Beam Computed Tomographic imaging in orthodontics. Aust Dent J. 2017 Mar;62 Suppl 1:33-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12479 PMid:28297089
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
