Comparative assessment of profilometric indicators of the lower part of the face in adult patients with congenital nonunions of the upper lip and palate before and after orthopedic treatment.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2024-2-33Keywords:
congenital cleft lip and palate, maxillofacial anomalies, defects and deformities of the maxillofacial system, orthopedic rehabilitation of adult patients, orthopedic structures, photostatic analysis of the face profileAbstract
Topicality. Despite the search for diverse options for medical and social care for people with congenital cleft upper lip and palate after surgical interventions in adulthood, there are still problems related to the specifics of orthopedic treatment for such patients that need to be resolved. An important criterion for evaluating the effectiveness and success of treatment of patients with congenital cleft upper lip and palate is the improvement of their quality of life in the process of complex rehabilitation. One of the possible options for improving the quality of life of such patients and their social adaptation is orthopedic rehabilitation using numerous options for orthopedic designs of dentures, which reproduce both functional and, in part, aesthetic capabilities.
The aim of the study. To conduct a comparative assessment of the presence of facial profile aesthetics before and after orthopedic rehabilitation of patients with congenital cleft upper lip and palate after surgical interventions.
Materials and methods. A comparative assessment of the aesthetics of the face profile before and after orthopedic rehabilitation of 37 patients aged 17 to 42 years with congenital cleft upper lip and palate (CCULP) after surgical interventions was carried out. Researched: ratio in the area of the frontal height of the face (N-Sn-Gn), nasolabial angle (C-Sn-UL), conducted lip analysis according to Ricketts, as well as the angle between the line that passed through points (N-Pog’) and Ricketts’ line (aesthetic line) and profile concavity angle (G-An Pog’) before and after orthopedic treatment as a percentage of these indexes.
Conclusion. The analysis of the parameters of the profile of the lower part of the face, in particular the parameters of the lips according to Ricketts and the nasolabial angle, testify that as a result of orthopedic rehabilitation of patients with CCULP, regardless of the type of nonunion, both fixed and removable (combined) prosthetics, the profile of the lower part of the face improved significantly, which affected aesthetic parameters of the face.
Downloads
References
Chernysh A., Hasiuk P., Yasko V. & Smolko D. (2018). Regression models of individual cephalometric indicators used in the method of E. P. Harvold. Reports of Morphology, 24 (4), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.31393/morphology-journal-2018-24(4)-04
AL SABBAGH R. (2014). Syrian norms of McNamara cephalometric analysis. International Arab Journal of Dentistry (IAJD), 5(3), 95-101. Retrieved from https://journals.usj.edu.lb/iajd/article/view/204. https://doi.org/10.12816/0028756
Al Taki A., Yaqoub S. & Hassan M. (2018). Legan-burstone soft tissue profile values in a Circassian adult sample. Journal of orthodontic science, 7, 18. https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_27_18 PMid:30271763 PMCid:PMC6144759
Alam M.K., Basri R., Purmal K., Sikder M.A., Saifuddin M. & Iida J. (2013). Cephalometric norms in Bangladeshi adults using Harvold's analysis. International Medical Journal, 20 (1), 92-94.
Alam M.K., Basri R., Purmal K., Sikder M.A., Saifuddin M. & Iida J. (2013). Cephalometric norm study in a Bangladeshi population using McNamara analysis. International Medical Journal, 20 (1), 84-86.
Alam M.K., Basri R., Purmal K., Sikder M.A., Saifuddin M. & Iida J. (2013). Craniofacial morphology of Bangladeshi adult using Tweed's and Wit's analysis. International Medical Journal, 20 (2), 197-200.
Chernysh A.V. (2018). Cephalometric studies of Ukrainian adolescents with orthognathic bite by the method of E. P. Harvold. Reports of Morphology, 24 (2), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.31393/morphology-journal-2018-24(2)-06
Chernysh A.V., Gunas І.V., Gavryluk A.O., Dmytrenko S.V., Serebrennikova O.A., Kyrychenko Yu.V. & Balynska M.V. (2018). Cephalometric studies of ukrainian boys and girls with orthognathic bite by the method of R. M. Ricketts. World of Medicine and Biology, 14( 64), 88-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.26724/2079-8334-2018-2-64-88-93
Dmitriev M., Chernysh A. & Chugu T. (2018). Cephalometric studies of Ukrainian boys and girls with physiological bite by the method of Charles J. Burstone. Biomedical and Biosocial Anthropology, (30), 62-67. https://doi.org/10.31393/bba30-2018-09
Halych, L. V. (2014) Estetychni osoblyvosti profiliu oblychchia u ditey 10-13 rokiv iz zuboshchelepnymy anomaliiamy 1 klasu za Enhlem iz riznymy typamy rostu nyzhnoi shchelepy. Aktualni problem suchasnoi medytsyny, 14 (3 (47)), 35-38.
Makarova О.М. (2013). Asymetriia hub ta zubnykh riadiv u patsiientiv z odnostoronnim ІІ klasom za Engle. Aktualni problem suchasnoi medytsyny: Visnyk ukrainskoi medychnoi stomatolohichnoi akademii, 13(2 (42)), 35-38.
El-Ashmawi N.A., Fayed M.M.S., El-Beialy A., Fares A.E., & Attia K.H. (2022). Evaluation of Facial Esthetics Following NAM Versus CAD/NAM in Infants With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Randomized Clinical Trial. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Apr: 10556656221093176. https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221093176 PMid:35422139
Holovko N. (2018). Estetchni osoblyvosti budovy oblychchia v ditey iz zuboshchelepnymy anomaliiamy 1 klasu za Енглем ta porushenniam nosovoho dykhannia za danymy fotometrii. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh, (2), 56-59. https://dentalalmanac.org/index.php/journal/article/view/28.
Kulish N.V. (2012). Otsinka stanu oblychchia v patsiientiv vikom 12-15 rokiv iz bukalnoiu formoiu perekhresnoho prykusu. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh, (4), 102-105.
Makieiev V.F. (2008). Klinika, diahnostyka ta kontseptualni osnovy ortopedychnykh zakhodiv u kompleksnomu likuvanni defektiv ta deformatsii zubo-shchelepnoi systemy khvorykh z nezroshchenniamy verkhnoi huby ta pidnebinnia [Avtoref. dys. dokt. med. nauk, Lvivskyi natsionalnyi medychnyi universytet imeni Danyla Halytskoho].
Nettsel F., Shults K. (2006). Praktycheskoe rukovodstvo po ortodontycheskoi dyahnostyke. Analyz i tablitsy dlia ispolzovania v praktyke. Lvov, GalDent.
Pucciarelli M.G.R., de Lima Toyoshima G.H., de Oliveira T.M., Neppelenbroek K.H. & Soares S. (2022). Quantifying the facial proportions in edentulous individuals before and after rehabilitation with complete dentures compared with dentate individuals: A 3D stereophotogrammetry study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.013 PMid:35431030
De Queiroz Herkrath A.P.C., Herkrath F.J., Rebelo M.A.B. & Vettore M.V. (2018). Determinants of health-related and oral health-related quality of life in adults with orofacial clefts: A cross-sectional study. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 55 (9), 1244-1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618763377 PMid:29537882
Frederick R., Hogan A.C., Seabolt N. & Stocks R.M.S. (2022). An Ideal Multidisciplinary Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate Care Team. Oral Diseases, 00, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.14213 PMid:35429208
Gordiyuk N.M., Boyko G.G., Anisimova L.A., Belyaeva I.V. (2010). Psihoterapevticheskiy podhod pri rozhdenii rebenka s vrozhdennoy chelyustno-litsevoy patologiey. Visnyk stomatolohii, (2), 9.
Crockett D.J. & Goudy S.L. (2014). Cleft lip and palate. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America, 22 (4), 573-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2014.07.002 PMid:25444729
Kortelainen, T., Tolvanen, M., Luoto, A., Ylikontiola, L. P., S ndor, G. K., & Lahti, S. (2015). Oral health-related quality of life among cleft lip and/or palate and schoolchildren. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal: Official Publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 53(5), 172-176. https://doi.org/10.1597/14-180 PMid:26171571
Bos A. & Prahl C. (2011). Oral health-related quality of life in Dutch children with cleft lip and/or palate. The Angle Orthodontist, 81 (5), 865-871. https://doi.org/10.2319/070110-365.1 PMid:21506658 PMCid:PMC8916177
Mossey P.A, Little J., Munger R.G., Dixon M.J. & Shaw W.C. (2009). Cleft lip and palate. Lancet, 374 (9703), 1773-1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4 PMid:19747722
Pisek A., Pitiphat W., Chowchuen B., & Pradubwong S. (2014). Oral health status and oral impacts on quality of life in early adolescent cleft patients. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 97 Suppl 10, S7-S16.
Broder H.L., Wilson-Genderson M. & Sischo L. (2012). Health disparities among children with cleft. American Journal of Public Health, 102 (5), 828-830. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300654 PMid:22420792 PMCid:PMC3325366
Corrêa de Queiroz Herkrath A. P., Herkrath F.J., Bessa Rebelo M.A. & Vettore, M.V. (2018). Determinant sof health-related and oral health-related quality of life in adults with orofacial clefts: A cross-sectional study. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal: official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 55 (9), 1244-1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618763377 PMid:29537882
Botelho M.G., Ma X., Cheung G.J., Law R.K., Tai M.T. & Lam W.Y. (2014). Long-term clinical evaluation of 211 two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Journal of Dentistry, 42 (7), 778-784. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.004 PMid:24685984
Cenci M.S., Rodolpho P.A., Pereira-Cenci T., Del Bel Cury A.A. & Demarco F.F. (2010). Fixed partial dentures in an up to 8-year follow-up. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 18 (4), 364-371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000400008 PMid:20835571 PMCid:PMC5349064
Marilia Mattar De Amôedo Campos Velo, Coelho L.V., Basting R.T., Amaral F.L. & França F.M. (2016). Longevity of restorations in direct composite resin: literature review. RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, 64 (3), 320-326. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-8637201600030000123109
Tan K., Pjetursson B.E., Lang N.P. & Chan E. S. (2004). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. III. Conventional FPDs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 15 (6), 654-666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x PMid:15533126
Bilhan H., Geckili O., Ergin S., Erdogan O. & Ates G. (2013). Evaluation of satisfaction and complications in patients with existing complete dentures. Journal of Oral Science, 55 (1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.55.29 PMid:23485598
Al-Imam H., Özhayat E.B., Benetti А.R., Pedersen A.M.L. & Gotfredsen K. (2015). Oral health-related quality of life and complications after treatment with partial removable dental prosthesis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, (43), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12338 PMid:26268721
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 «VYDAVNYCHYY BUDYNOK EXPERT» LLC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
