Сучасні цифрові підходи до діагностики та планування ортопедичної реабілітації пацієнтів із втратою зубів внаслідок поранення щелепно-лицьової ділянки (огляд літератури)

B. Brozhyna

doi:10.33295/1992-576X-2025-3-117

Authors

B. Brozhyna Shupik National University of Healthcare https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5771-9895

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2025-3-117

Keywords:

gastroesophageal reflux disease, damage to hard dental tissues, bruxism, obstructive sleep apnea

Abstract

Topicality. The article addresses the current issue of the unique characteristics of modern digital approaches to diagnosing and planning orthopedic rehabilitation in patients with maxillofacial region injuries resulting in tooth loss. This issue is becoming more urgent as a result of active hostilities in Ukraine and the growing number of military and civilians with injuries to the maxillofacial area. For effective rehabilitation, digital technologies can be used with traditional diagnostic methods. It has been shown that digital approaches and technologies have been actively developing recently, their implementation is becoming more widespread, and they are actively transforming dental and craniofacial medicine.
The introduction of artificial intelligence into prosthetic dentistry for the rehabilitation of patients with maxillofacial area injuries can enhance the accuracy of diagnosis and simplify treatment planning. Additionally, it will facilitate the development of a personalized approach to orthopedic rehabilitation planning through digital analysis of diagnostic data, enabling the determination of effective orthopedic interventions for each patient with tooth loss resulting from maxillofacial injuries. A personalized digital dental passport encoded using digital technologies can provide rehabilitation and manufacture of prostheses based on 3D-printed dental biomaterials. The paper discusses the use of 3D scanners and CAD/CAM technologies, which involve digital programs (Dentsply Sirona CEREC, 3Shape TRIOS, Exocad, Blue Sky Plan, Nobel Biocare, Mesh mixer, Dental Wings), to improve the accuracy of diagnosis, planning, and manufacturing of prostheses.
Thus, the analysis of the possibilities of orthopedic diagnostic methods for patients who have lost their teeth due to injury has shown that artificial intelligence is expanding diagnostic and treatment capabilities. Thanks to various types of computed tomography, intraoral scanning, digital occlusiography, and modern digital programs and platforms, it is possible to develop individualized treatment plans, plan orthopedic rehabilitation more accurately, and increase its effectiveness. Therefore, the introduction of these technologies can help improve medical outcomes, increase patient satisfaction, and increase the efficiency of the healthcare system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

B. Brozhyna, Shupik National University of Healthcare

Postgraduate student of the Department of Therapeutic Dentistry

References

Wei, X., Du, Y., Zhou, X. et al. (2023). Expert consensus on digital guided therapy for endodontic diseases. Int J Oral Sci, 15(1): 54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-023-00261-0. PMid: 38052782. PMCid: PMC10697975

Franco, R., Minervini, G. (2024). Digitalization, technologies, new approaches, and telemedicine in dentistry and craniofacial / temporomandibular disorders. Appl Sci, 14(13), 5871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135871.

Alqahtani, J., Alhemaid, G., Alqahtani, H. et al. (2022). Digital diagnostics and orthodontic practice. J Health Sci, 2: 112–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135871.

Mykhailenko, A.O. (2023). Reconstructive surgeries in the maxillofacial region. Description of clinical cases. Ukrainian scientific medical youth journal, 1(137): 102–103 [Михайленко, А.О. (2023). Реконструктивні операції в щелепно-лицевій ділянці. Опис клінічних випадків. Ukrainian scientific medical youth journal, 1(137), 102-103]. URL: https://mmj.nmuofficial.com/index.php/journal/article/view/45.].

Department of Maxillofacial Therapy, Institute of Postgraduate Education, O. O. Bogomolets National Medical University [ Кафедра щелепно-лицьової терапії Інституту післядипломної освіти Національного медичного університету імені О. О. Богомольця ]. URL: https://www.maxillofacial.education/kafedra/

Coachman, C., Calamita, M.A., Sesma, N. (2017). Dynamic documentation of the smile and the 2D/3D digital smile design process. Int J Periodont Restorat Dent, 37(2): 183–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2911. PMid: 28196157

Minervini, G., Franco, R., Marrapodi, M. M. et al. (2023). Conservative treatment of temporomandibular joint condylar fractures: A systematic review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. J Oral Rehabil. 50: 886–893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13497. PMid: 37191365

Lin, W.S., Harris, B.T., Elathamna, E.N., Morton, D. (2021). Integrating clinical photography, intraoral scanning, and CBCT in digital dentistry: A comprehensive workflow for restorative and surgical planning. J Prosthodontics, 30(6): 500–508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13296. PMid: 33215755

Salmassian, H., Becker, M., Brown, S., Ackerman, M.B. (2023). Clinical facial photography in orthodontics and maxillofacial surgery: Current concepts and digital evolution. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North America, 35(2): 261–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2022.11.004.

Baldini, B., Cavagnetto, D., Baselli, G., Sforza, C., Tartaglia, G.M. (2022). Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: A cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias. BMC Oral Health, 22(1): 98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02131-3. PMid: 35351080. PMCid: PMC8966183

Wang, R.H., Ho, C.T., Lin, H.H., Lo, L.J. (2020). Three-dimensional cephalometry for orthognathic planning: Normative data and analyses. J Formos Med Assoc, 119: 191–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2019.04.001. PMid: 31003919

Sivari, E., Senirkentli, G.B., Bostanci, E. et al. (2023). Deep learning in diagnosis of dental anomalies and diseases: A systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 13(15): 2512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152512. PMid: 37568875 PMCid: PMC10416832

Folly, P. (2021). Imaging techniques in dental radiology: Acquisition, anatomic analysis and interpretation of radiographic images. BDJ Stud, 28: 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41406-021-0258-7.

Krymovskyy, K., Mileschenko, A., Brychko, T. (2024). Is it possible to completely replace traditional cephalometric analyses with 3D cephalometrics based on artificial intelligence shortly? (Systematicreview). Archive of Ophthalmology and Maxillofacial Surgery of Ukraine, 1(1): 43–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22141/aomfs.1.1.2024.9.

Unsal, G.S., Turkyilmaz, I., Lakhia, S. (2020). Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with CAD/CAM surgical guides: A literature review. J Clin Exp Dent, 12(4): e409-e417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55871. PMid: 32382391 PMCid: PMC7195681

Alauddin, M.S., Baharuddin, A.S., Mohd Ghazali, M.I. (2021). The modern and digital transformation of oral health care: A mini review. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 9(2): 118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020118. PMid: 33503807. PMCid: PMC7912705

Abdelaziz, M.S., Elshikh, E.M. (2024). Digital design of a hybrid bone and tooth-supported surgical guide in patients with unilateral few remaining natural teeth: a dental technique. BMC Res, 17(1): 80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06738-3. PMid: 38500215. PMCid: PMC10949771

Parekar, D., Selvaganesh, S., Nesappan, T. (2024). Comparative evaluation of accuracy of adjacent parallel implant placements between dynamic navigation and static guide: A prospective study. Cureus, 16(3): e57331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57331.

Almalki, A., Conejo, J., Kutkut, N. et al. (2024). Evaluation of the accuracy of direct intraoral scanner impressions for digital post and core in various post lengths: An in-vitro study. J Esthet Restor Dent, 36(4): 673–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13159. PMid: 37921014

Gehrke, P., Rashidpour, M., Sader, R., Özcan, M. (2024). A systematic review of factors impacting intraoral scanning accuracy in implant dentistry with emphasis on scan bodies. Int J Implant Dent, 10: 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-024-00543-0. PMid: 38691258. PMCid: PMC11063012

Hao, J., Liu, J., Li, J. et al. (2022). AI-enabled automatic multimodal fusion of cone-beam CT and intraoral scans for intelligent 3D tooth-bone reconstruction and clinical applications. Arxiv preprint. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.05784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1472915/v1

Silva, T.P., Hughes, M.M., Menezes, L.D.S. et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based cephalometric landmark annotation and measurements according to Arnett’s analysis: Can we trust a bot to do that? Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 51(6), 20200548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200548. PMid: 33882247. PMCid: PMC10043619

Gokdeniz, S.T., Kamburoğlu, K. (2022). Artificial intelligence in dentomaxillofacial radiology. World J Radiol, 14(3): 55–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v14.i3.55. PMid: 35432776. PMCid: PMC8966498

Duran, G.S., Gökmen, Ş., Topsakal, K.G., Görgülü, S. (2023). Evaluation of the accuracy of fully automatic cephalometric analysis software with artificial intelligence algorithm. Orthod Craniofacial Res, 26: 481–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12633. PMid: 36648374

Kılınç, D.D., Kırcelli, B.H., Sadry, S., Karaman, A. (2022). Evaluation and comparison of smartphone application tracing, web based artificial intelligence tracing and conventional hand tracing methods. J Stomatol, Oral Maxillofac Surg, 123(6): e906-e915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2022.07.017. PMid: 35901950

Gorurgoz, C., Icen, M., Kurt, M. et al. (2023). Degenerative changes of the mandibular condyle in relation to the temporomandibular joint space, gender and age: A multicenter CBCT study. Dent Med Problems, 60(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/147514. PMid: 37023340

Lombardo, G., Signoriello, A., Marincola, M. et al. (2023). Five-year follow-up of 8- and 6-mm locking-taper implants treated with a reconstructive surgical protocol for peri-implantitis: A retrospective evaluation. Prosthesis, 5(4): 1322–1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5040091.

Mangano, F., Veronesi, G., Hauschild, U., Mijiritsky, E., Mangano, C. (2020). Trueness and precision of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: A comparative in vitro study. PLoS One, 15(9): e0238581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238581. PMid: 32881948. PMCid: PMC7470335

Kwon, J.H., Kim, Y.K., Lee, H., Kim, S.G. (2022). Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in implant placement using the CAD/CAM system: A randomized controlled clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 33(5): 476–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13874. PMid: 34881822. PMCid: PMC9394592

Cin, V., İzgi, A.D., Kale, E., Yilmaz, B. (2023). Marginal and internal fit of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using two different cad-cam workflows: An in vitro study. Prosthesis, 5(1): 35–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5010003.

Alaoffey, A.S., Asiri, M.A., Alhazmi, T.A.A. et al. (2024). Digital dentistry: transforming diagnosis and treatment planning through CAD/CAM and 3D printing. Egypt J Chem, 67(13): 1177–1190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2024.332979.10717.

Jung, R.E., Zitzmann, N.U., Hammerle, C.H.F. (2021). Cone beam computed tomography and guided implant surgery: A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 36(2): 243–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8910.

Tallarico, M., Cuccu, M., Meloni, S.M. et al. (2023). Digital analysis of a novel impression method named the biological-oriented digital impression technique: A clinical audit. Prosthesis, 5(4): 992–1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5040068.

D’Ambrosio, F., Giordano, F., Sangiovanni, G., Di Palo, M.P., Amato, M. (2023). Conventional versus digital dental impression techniques: What is the future? An Umbrella Review. Prosthesis, 5(3): 851–875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5030060.

Ahlholm, P., Sipilä, K., Vallittu, P., Jakonen, M., Kotiranta, U. (2018). Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: A review. J Prosthodont, 27: 35–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12527. PMid: 27483210

Fieldhouse, S. (2021). CADCAM in dentistry. Materials and methods: an overview for the dental team. Dental Update, 48(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2021.48.8.671.

Schmalzl, J., Róth, I., Borbély, J. et al. (2023). The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners. BMC Oral Health, 23: 219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02926-y. PMid: 37061664. PMCid: PMC10105929

Barayan, M.A., Qawas, A.A., Alghamdi, A.S. et al. (2022). Effectiveness of machine learning in assessing the diagnostic quality of bitewing radiographs. Appl Sci, 12(19): 9588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199588.