Post-and-Core Restorations with 3D Technologies: Benefits and Limitations

Narmina Azad Gurskaya

doi:10.33295/1992-576X-2025-6-18

Authors

Narmina Azad Gurskaya Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2025-6-18

Keywords:

tooth-preserving technologies, polymer post-and-core restorations, extensive crown defects, additive manufacturing, 3D printing

Abstract

Post-and-core restorations in prosthetic dentistry are employed to replace defects in hard dental tissues, aiming to preserve the integrity and function of the dental arch while achieving superior esthetic outcomes. When appropriately applied as supports for artificial crowns, these restorations maintain the tooth root and provide high esthetic quality and functionality, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness of prosthetic treatment.
Polymer-based post-and-core restorations fabricated through additive manufacturing have become an essential component of modern dental practice. They play a pivotal role in rehabilitating severely compromised teeth following endodontic treatment. The application of 3D-printed polymer restorations demonstrates considerable promise for advancing tooth-preserving technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Narmina Azad Gurskaya, Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan

Doctor of Philosophy in Medicine, Assistant Department of Orthopedic Dentistry

References

Dimitrova, M., Vlahova, A., & Kazakova R. (2024). Assessment of CAD/CAM fabrication technologies for post and core restorations—a narrative review. Medicina (Kaunas), 60(5), 748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050748.

Kasem, A. T., Shams, M., & Tribst, J. P. M. (2022). The use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as an alternative post and core material: five-year follow-up report. Dent J (Basel), 10(12), 237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10120237.

Paqué, P. N., & Özcan, M. (2024). A review on biocompatibility of dental restorative and reconstruction materials. Curr Oral Health Rep, 11, 68–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-023-00358-9.

Cai, H., Xu, X., Lu X., et al. (2023). Dental materials applied to 3D and 4D printing technologies: a review. Polymers (Basel), 15(10), 2405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102405.

Ali, F., Kalva, S. N., & Koc, M. (2024). Advancements in 3D printing techniques for biomedical applications: a comprehensive review of materials consideration, post-processing, applications, and challenges. Discov Mater, 4, 53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-024-00115-4 EDN: QCLAIH

Guttridge, C., Shannon, A., O’Sullivan A., et al. (2022). Biocompatible 3D printing resins for medical applications: a review of marketed intended use, biocompatibility certification, and post-processing guidance. Annals of 3D Printed Medicine, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100044

Daher, R., Ardu, S., di Bella E., et al. (2024). Efficiency of 3D-printed composite resin restorations compared with subtractive materials: evaluation of fatigue behavior, cost, and time of production. J Prosthet Dent, 131(5), 943–950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.001. EDN: KYKCLG

Çelik Öge S., Küden, C., & Ekren, O. (2024). Evaluation of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed post and core systems. Int J Prosthodont, 37(7), 127–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8860

Khorsandi, D., Fahimipour, A., Abasian P., et al. (2021). 3D and 4D printing in dentistry and maxillofacial surgery: printing techniques, materials, and applications. Acta Biomater, 122, 26–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.044. EDN: ZMOBUU

Hassanpour, M., Narongdej, P., Alterman, N., et al. (2024). Effects of post-processing parameters on 3D-printed dental appliances: a review. Polymers (Basel), 16(19), 2795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16192795.

Vichi, A., Balestra, D., & Louca, C. (2024). Effect of different finishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of a 3D-printed material for permanent dental use. Appl Sci, 14(16), 7289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14167289. EDN: UDQHPF

Abdelmohsen, N., Wahsh, M., Zohdy, M., et al. (2025). Mode of failure and finite element analysis of custom-made PEEK post-core (milled and pressed). Odontology, 113, 1582–1593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-025-01084-7.

Popescu, M., Perieanu, V. S., Burlibașa, M., et al. (2025). Comparative cost-effectiveness of resin 3D printing protocols in dental prosthodontics: a systematic review. Prosthesis, 7(4), 78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7040078.

Jambhule, Sh., Palandurkar, M., & Shewale, A. (2022). 3D printing in dentistry. Int J Adv Res, 10(03), 742–750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/14443.