Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation in Reducing Clinical Symptoms in Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2024-6-72

Keywords:

temporomandibular joint, dysfunction, pain, electrotherapy, physiotherapy

Abstract

Abstract. Today, the prevalence of temporomandibular joint dysfunction among the world’s population is approximately 80%. Quite often, this disease significantly impairs the quality of life, sometimes even leading to disability. Today, there are methods for treating temporomandibular joint dysfunction with electrotherapy, including transcutaneous electrical nerve.
The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of TENS and MENS therapy in reducing clinical symptoms in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction.

Materials and methods: 40 participants participated in the study and were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group I received treatment with TENS therapy, and group II—MENS therapy. The frequency of treatment was 2 sessions per week, and the total duration of treatment was 10 sessions.

Results. In comparison, between the baseline and the result at the end of 10 sessions, the HRV in group I decreased by 37.5% and in group II —by 27.03%. When comparing the results of treatment for VAS between the baseline and 1 month after treatment, the results in group I showed a 33.33% reduction in pain, and in group II 22.98%. The improvement in maximum mouth opening at 10 sessions compared to the baseline in group I was 12.98% and in group II —10.67%. When comparing the indicators of maximum mouth opening between the baseline and one month after treatment, an increase in this parameter was observed in group I by 11.87% and in group II — by 9.43%.

Conclusions: according to the study results, the use of TENS- and MENS therapy is effective in treating temporomandibular joint disorders, but during the treatment, TENS therapy showed slightly better results in reducing clinical symptoms. However, 1 month after the end of treatment, the effect of electrotherapy decreases slightly, but still, the clinical symptoms are better compared to the initial situation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

A. M. Proshchenko, Bogomolets National Medical University

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry

I. A. Shynchukovskyi, Bogomolets National Medical University

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Dentistry

References

Karakaş, Merve, and Haydar Gök. Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study. Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 66,2. 140–146. 18 May. 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169 PMID: 32760890.

Curtis, Denise et al. The efficacy of frequency specific microcurrent therapy on delayed onset muscle soreness. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, vol. 14,3 (2010): 272–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.01.009 PMID: 20538225.

Yadav, Utkarsh et al. Influence of Psychosocial Factors and Parafunctional Habits in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Permanente journal, vol. 24 (2020): 19.144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/19.144 PMID: 33196422.

Melzack, R, and P D Wall. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science (New York, N.Y.) vol. 150,3699 (1965): 971–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3699.971 PMID: 5320816.

Fertout, Aurélie et al. Management of temporomandibular disorders with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: A systematic review. Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice, vol. 40(3): 217–228. (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2019.1687986 PMID: 31709922.

Feng, Jie et al. The treatment modalities of masticatory muscle pain a network meta-analysis. Medicine, vol. 98, 46 (2019): e17934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017934 PMID: 31725647.

Schiffman, Eric et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, vol. 28,1 (2014): 6–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1151 PMID: 24482784.

Valesan, Lígia Figueiredo et al. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clinical oral investigations, vol. 25,2 (2021): 441–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03710-w PMID: 33409693.

Rajpurohit, Bharat et al. Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation in bruxism associated with masticatory muscle pain-a comparative study. Indian journal of dental research: official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research vol. 21,1 (2010): 104–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.62816 PMID: 20427917.

Marmann, Peter, and Werner Wiatrek. Observational Study to Assesses the Efficacy and Safety of Microcurrent Therapy with a Portable Device in Patients Suffering from Chronic Back Pain, Skeletal System Pain, Fibromyalgia, Migraine or Depression. Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) vol. 16 261–280. 7 Dec. 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S436667 PMID: 38090106.

Published

2024-12-17

How to Cite

Proshchenko А. М., & Shynchukovskyi І. А. (2024). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation in Reducing Clinical Symptoms in Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction. Actual Dentistry, (6), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2024-6-72

Issue

Section

PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY