Analysis of the Success of the Stages of Orthopedic Rehabilitation of Patients with Small Included Dentition Defects with Fixed Structures Supported by Dental Implants by Studying the Prevalence of Current Complications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2025-4-52Keywords:
dental implants, fixed orthopedic structures, complications of dental implantation, patient satisfaction, success of dental prostheticsAbstract
Abstract. The article is devoted to analyzing the success of dental implantation and the complications that arise during the orthopedic stage, specifically from obtaining an impression to fixing the finished orthopedic structure in the patient’s oral cavity. The impact of complications that occur at this stage on the quality of the final work and patient satisfaction is also investigated.
Objective: To assess the success of the stages of orthopedic rehabilitation of patients with minor dental defects with fixed structures supported by dental implants by studying the prevalence of ongoing complications.
Materials and methods. The success of the orthopedic restoration process with structures supported by one or two dental implants was assessed in 189 patients aged 18 to 45 years (108 women and 81 men) with Kennedy Class III dentition defects. Patients who received orthopedic structures supported by one or two dental implants with an 11-degree internal cone of the suprastructure were divided into two groups depending on the type of fixation: Group I—with screw fixation (108 patients) and Group II—with cement fixation (81 patients). The main manipulations during which complications could occur were analyzed: 1) at the stage of obtaining an impression (clinical), 2) at the stage of selecting the suprastructure (laboratory), and 3) at the stage of fixing the finished orthodontic structure in the patient’s oral cavity. After the fixation of the finished orthopedic structure, an analysis of patient satisfaction with the orthopedic structure was conducted using the Net Promoter System (NPS).
Results. When analyzing the study results, 109 (57.8%) patients did not experience any special problems or complications during the orthopedic stage; everything proceeded according to the protocol without any unusual occurrences. The remaining patients, namely 80 (42.2%), had problems at various orthopedic stages that could cause complications in the further functioning of the orthopedic structure. Analysis of complications that occurred during the stages of orthopedic restoration revealed that a problem was observed in 37.71% of patients in groups I and II (11.18% and 26.53%, respectively) during impression taking. At the stage of selecting the superstructure and manufacturing an artificial crown (in the laboratory), 34.7% of complications were observed in groups I and II, with rates of 6.13% and 28.57%, respectively. At the stage of fixing the finished orthopedic structure, complications occurred in 27 (27.61%). In the analysis of patient satisfaction, the NPS index in the screw fixation group was 75.6% among men and 70.49% among women. In the cement fixation group, the NPS index was 64.64% among men and 58.14% among women, indicating high satisfaction with this type of rehabilitation. The NPS index for patients with screw fixation was 12% better than for those with cement fixation. The difference in satisfaction with the service received between men and women was not significant and was within 5% in favor of men.
Conclusions. The results of the obtained studies indicate the relevance of this problem and determine the further direction of research, aiming to improve the quality of dental care with orthopedic structures supported by dental implants.
The analysis of the studies indicates a high prevalence of complications at the orthopedic stage of dental implantation in 42.2% of patients, which was more common with cement-type fixation in 28.5% of cases, compared to 13.7% with screw fixation. The highest frequency of complications was observed at the stage of obtaining an impression (37.71%) and when selecting a prosthetic component (34.7%). Despite this, the patient satisfaction index NPS was high in all patients and, with screw-type fixation, 12% higher compared to cement type.
Downloads
References
P. Papaspyridakos, C-J. Chen, M. Singh, H-P. Weber, GO. Gallucci. (2012). Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res, 91(3), 242–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431252.
Chrcanovic B. R., J. Kisch, Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. (2016). Factors Influencing Early Dental Implant Failures. J Dent Res, 95(9), 995–1002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516646098.
Sadid-Zadeh R, Kutkut A, Kim H. (2015). Prosthetic failure in implant dentistry. Dent Clin North Am, 59(1), 195–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.008.
Irena Sailer, Duygu Karasan, Ana Todorovic, Maria Ligoutsikou, Bjarni Elvar Pjetursson. (2022). Prosthetic failures in dental implant therapy. 4. Periodontol 2000, 88(1), 130–144. PMID: 35103329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12416.
Dr. Manela Shill, Dr. Narendra Kumar, Dr. Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Dr. Kunwarjeet Singh and Dr. Humaira Tanvir. (2021). Clinical complications with implant prosthesis: A review. Int J Appl Dent Sci, 7(1), 472–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2021.v7.i1g.1171.
Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic, Jenö Kisch, Tomas Albrektsson, Ann Wennerberg. (2017). Analysis of risk factors for cluster behavior of dental implant failures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 19(4), 632–642. PMID: 28332286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12485.
Dobrovolska, O. V. (2019). A modern view on complications in dental implantation. Clinical Dentistry, (3), 32–39. [ О. В. Добровольська. (2019). Сучасний погляд на ускладнення в дентальній імплантації. Клiнiчна стоматологія, (3), 32–39. ]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11603/2311-9624.2019.3.10572.
Fastovets, O. O., Sapalov, S. O. (2019). Comparative clinical and functional evaluation of the prosthetic efficiency complete dentures and removable dentures with support on implants in edentulous patients. Visnyk stomatolohiyi, 31(1), 64–68. [In Ukrainian].
Storelli, S., del Fabbro, M., Scanferla, M., Palandrani, G., Romeo, E. (2018). Implant supported cantilevered fixed dental rehabilitations in partially edentulous patients: Systematic review of the literature. Part I. Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, 253–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13311.
Guastaldi, F. P. S., Queiroz, T. P., Marques, D. O. et al. (2021). Comparative evaluation of implants with different surface treatments placed in human edentulous mandibles: a 1-year prospective study. J. Maxillofacial Oral Surg, 21, 815–823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-021-01600-6.
H. J. Meijer, G. M. Raghoebar, R. J. Goené, G. A. van der Weijden. ( 2011). Complications in patients with oral implants. Recommendations for routine preventive inspections. Ned. Tijdschr. Tandheelk, 2021. Vol. 118(9), 431–7. PMID: 21957639.
Symonenko R., & Vefelev. S. (2025). Ways to Optimize Dental Rehabilitation Measures for Patients with Metabolic Syndrome Before Implant Prosthetics. Actual Dentistry, (3), 90–96. [ Симоненко, Р., & Вефелєв, С. (2025). Шляхи оптимізації заходів стоматологічної реабілітації пацієнтів з метаболічним синдромом перед протезуванням на імплантатах. Cучасна стоматологія, (3), 90–96. ] DOI: https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2025-3-90.
Ministry of Health of Ukraine, State Expert Center of the Misinstry of Health of Ukraine (2023). Crowns, fixed bridges and dental implants. Evidence-based clinical guideline. [ Міністерство охорони здоров’я України, Державний експертний центр Міністерства охорони здоров’я України. (2023). Коронки, незнімні мостоподібні протези та зубні імплантати. Клінічна настанова, заснована на доказах. ]. URL: https://www.dec.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/kbn_333_20022023.pdf
Musiienko, O., Parii, V., Morhun, O., Koval, V. (2024). Influence of the angle of dental implant placement on the stress-strain state of the jaw. USMYJ [Internet], 144(1), 98–104. URL: https://mmj.nmuofficial.com/index.php/journal/article/view/20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32345/USMYJ.1(144).2024.98-104
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 “VYDAVNYCHYY BUDYNOK EXPERT” LLC

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.