The Significance of Diagnosing Fractures of the Coronoid Process of the Mandible in the Occurrence of Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunctions

Authors

  • T. Glushchenko Educational and Scientific Institute of Dentistry and Laboratory Medicine, State Higher Educational Institution “UzhgorodNational University,” Uzhgorod, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8534-5078

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2025-6-35

Keywords:

fracture of the coronoid process of the mandible, diagnosis of temporomandibular joint dysfunction, methods of treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction, prevention of complications of untreated fracture of the coronoid process of the mandible

Abstract

Summary. The etiological factors of temporomandibular joint disorders are increasingly relevant; over the past decade, the number of publications on this topic has increased significantly. However, until now, the traumatic factor in the development of TMJ disorders has not been sufficiently covered due to complicated analysis and insufficient diagnostics. According to analytical data, mandibular fractures are the most common type of fractures of the facial bones, among which, according to leading scientists, fractures of the coronoid process of the mandible account for 19% to 35%, of which 84% of cases are unilateral fractures, and 16% are bilateral.
The goal is to establish the significance of diagnosing fractures of the coronoid process of the mandible as an etiological factor of temporomandibular joint disorders.
Materials and methods of the study. Fifty patients aged 12 to 72 years who presented with TMJ pain disorders and had previously undiagnosed and untreated mandibular coronoid fractures were selected. All patients underwent TMJ examination with cone-beam computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, followed by palpation (according to the M. Rocobano pain map) and deprogramming of the masticatory muscles (using the Cois or Dawson method).
Results. During the study, the following options for visualization of old fractures were identified: 1) ideal adaptation—cases with a high risk of being undiagnosed, characterized by a complete or almost complete absence of the fracture line, determined by the specific shape of the articular head, patient interview data, and only at the initial stages of rehabilitation; requires extraordinarily high-quality diagnostics. 2) Optimal adaptation—the fracture line is well visualized, even after many years, has a restored cortical plate, and destructive changes in the structure of bone tissue are often present. 3) Low adaptation: the fracture line is well visualized, the cortical plate is destroyed, and destructive changes in the structure of bone tissue are present.
Conclusions. It has been established that among patients presenting with temporomandibular joint disorders, 15% of patients have an old, undiagnosed injury, which is an etiological factor of TMJ disorders. Their treatment is complicated by the long duration of this pathology’s development. This indicates the need for mandatory diagnostic measures, in particular radiological examinations, in patients even with non-obvious signs of maxillofacial injuries at the initial presentation and in subsequent presentations with signs of TMJ disorders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

T. Glushchenko, Educational and Scientific Institute of Dentistry and Laboratory Medicine, State Higher Educational Institution “UzhgorodNational University,” Uzhgorod, Ukraine

Postgraduate student of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry of the Educational and Scientific Institute of Dentistry and Laboratory Medicine

References

Alyahya, A., Bin Ahmed, A., Nusair, Y., Ababtain, R., Alhussain, A., & Alshafei, A. (2020). Mandibular condylar fracture: A systematic review of systematic reviews and a proposed algorithm for management. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 58, 625–631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.03.014

Lalloo, R., Lucchesi, L. R., Bisignano, C., Castle, C. D., Dingels, Z., Fox, J. T., et al. (2020). Epidemiology of facial fractures: incidence, prevalence and years lived with disability estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study. Injury Prevention, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043297

Aksoy, E., Unlü, E., & Sensöz, O. (2002). A retrospective study on epidemiology and treatment of maxillofacial fractures. J Craniofac Surg, 13, 772–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200211000-00012

Dayalan, N., Kumari, B., Khanna, S. S., Ansari, F. M., Grewal, R., Kumar, S., & Tiwari, R. V. C. (2021). Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Sacrosanct in the Management of Subcondylar Fractures: A Comparative Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 13, S1633–S1636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_352_21

Renapurkar, S. K., & Strauss, R. A. (2019). Temporomandibular Joint Trauma. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 27(2), 99–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2019.05.001. PMID: 31345496.

Rikhotso, R., Ferretti, C., & Reyneke, J. (2017). A system for decision-making process on whether to treat mandibular condylar fractures open or closed. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 46:89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.319

Thean, D., & Chang, F. (2024). Mandibular condylar fractures: A 5-year retrospective analysis comparing open versus closed reduction. ANZ J Surg, 94, 597–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.18705

Singh, S. K., Kumar, A., Kapur, S., Singh, S. K., & Chaudhary, V. A. (2022). Randomised Comparative Study of Management of Subcondylar Fractures of Mandible-Conservative V/S Operative. Eur J Mol Clin Med, 9, 2766–2773.

Youssef SALY, Raghoebar II, Helmers R, de Lange J, Dubois L. (2025). Redefining and Identifying Evidence-Based Indications for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Mandibular Condylar Fractures: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Evidence Analysis. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr, 18(2), 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr18020025. PMID: 40416066

Vanpoecke, J., Dubron, K., & Politis, C. (2020). Condylar Fractures: An Argument for Conservative Treatment. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr, 13, 23–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520902881

Yesantharao, P. S. M., Lopez, J. M., Reategui, A. B., Jenny, H. M., Najjar, O. B., Yu, J. W. D., Yang, R. D., Manson, P. N., Dorafshar, A. M., & Redett, R. J. (2021). Combined Symphyseal and Condylar Fractures: Considerations for Treatment in Growing Pediatric Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg, 148:51e–62e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008055

Davis, B. (2013). Late reconstruction of condylar neck and head fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 25(4), 661–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2013.07.006. PMID: 24021625

Al-Moraissi, E. A., Wolford, L. M., Ellis, E., & Neff, A. (2020). The hierarchy of different treatments for arthrogenous temporomandibular disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 48, 9–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.10.004

Zhang, X., Li, K., Han, C., Li, H., & Liu, L. (2019). Prognosis of diacapitular condylar fractures: A multivariate analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 57, 1019–1024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.08.025

Kolk, A., Scheunemann, L.-M., Grill, F., Stimmer, H., Wolff, K.-D., & Neff, A. (2020). Prognostic factors for long-term results after condylar head fractures: A comparative study of non-surgical treatment versus open reduction and osteosynthesis. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg, 48, 1138–1145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.10.001

Han, X., Shao, X., Lin, X., Gui, W., Zhang, M., & Liang, L. (2020). Open Surgery Versus Closed Treatment of Unilateral Mandibular Condyle Fractures. J Craniofacial Surg, 31, 484–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006080

Lee, J., Jung, H.-Y, Ryu, J., Jung, S., Kook, M.-S., Park, H.-J., & Oh, H.-K. (2022). Open versus closed treatment for extracapsular fracture of the mandibular condyle. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 48, 303–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.5.303

Minervini, G., Franco, R., Marrapodi, M. M., Di Blasio, M., Isola, G., & Cicciu, M. (2023). Conservative treatment of temporomandibular joint condylar fractures: A systematic review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. J Oral Rehabil, 50, 886–893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13497

Ortiz-Gutierrez, A. L., Beltran-Salinas, B., & Cienfuegos, R. (2019). Mandibular condyle fractures: A diagnosis with controversial treatment. Cir Cir, 87, 587–594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.18000507

Patel, H. B., Desai, N. N., Matariya, R. G., Makwana, K. G., & Movaniya, P. N. (2021). Unilateral condylar fracture with review of treatment modalities in 30 cases—An evaluative study. Ann Maxillofac Surg, 11, 37–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_312_20

Zhou, Z., Li, Z., Ren, J., He, M., Huang, Y., Tian, W., & Tang, W. (2018). Digital diagnosis and treatment of mandibular condylar fractures based on Extensible Neuro imaging Archive Toolkit (XNAT) PLoS ONE, 13:e0192831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192831

Ren, R., Dai, J., Zhi, Y., Xie, F., & Shi, J. (2020). Comparison of temporomandibular joint function and morphology after surgical and non-surgical treatment in adult condylar head fractures. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg, 48, 323–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.01.019

Rozeboom, A., Schreurs, R., Helmer, L., Dubois, L., Lobbezoo, F., & de Lange, J. (2023). Volumetric outcomes of treatment for unilateral condylar fractures: A pilot study. Adv Oral Maxillofac Surg, 9, 100399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adoms.2023.100399

Shikara, M., Bridgham, K., Ludeman, E., Vakharia, K., & Justicz, N. (2023). Current Management of Subcondylar Fractures: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Neck Surg, 168, 956–969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.185

Nigel C. Smeeton. (2017). Dental Statistics Made Easy. Third edition. CRS London, UK: Press, 213 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315381275

Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2015). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 10th Edition. Printed in Canada, 755 p. ISBN: 978-1-305-50491-2.

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Glushchenko Т. Л. (2026). The Significance of Diagnosing Fractures of the Coronoid Process of the Mandible in the Occurrence of Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunctions. Actual Dentistry, (6), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2025-6-35

Issue

Section

GNATHOLOGY