Investigation of the interaction of cyclic loading by force of chewing pressure and higher with the surface of composite endocrons and fixing cement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2018-3-72-77Keywords:
endocrowns, composite, composite adhesive luting cement, cyclic loading, acoustic emissionAbstract
Introduction. To study the choice of materials and forms for endocrowns by studying their stability and wear under cyclic loading.
Materials and Methods. Conducting mechanical tests for cyclic loading force of chewing pressure of 450 and 750 N dental materials – composite (Tetric N-Ceram and composite adhesive cement (RelyX™ U200) to install VUSM-500 with using the method of acoustic emission (AE) and SKOP-8M systems. ZEISS EVO 40XVP fragmentation research in the scanning electron microscope (CEM) and statistical processing of the data.
Results. In the composite fatigue fracture occurred with rounded mikrokrater formed with arcuate ridges and mikrotrischy, we arranged from the center to the edges, actively developing after 53–60 thousand loading cycles. In the adhesive cement mikrokrater hemisphere is in the form of microcracks, located at the bottom, and
the path macrocrack after 10–20 thousand. loading cycles.
Conclusions. Under the influence of cyclic loading (500 thousand cycles), all dental materials were fatigued. The composite was the best indicator due to its high
filling (81.5 %). Composite luting cement due to porosity caused by filling the lower indicator showed relatively low rates of wear because endocrown border and tabs
for endodontic treated teeth are not recommended to place it at occlusions surface, especially at the occlusal contact point.
Key words: endocrowns, composite, composite adhesive luting cement, cyclic loading, acoustic emission.
Downloads
References
L.CHRISTIAN, S. STUDER, U. BRODBECK, P. SCHДRER // Acta Med. Dent. Helv. – 1998. – № 3. –
С. 137–146.
2. Leinfelder K. Composite inlay/onlay restorative systems / K. Leinfelder. // AGD Impact. in:
Academy of General. Dentistry, Chicago. – 1992. – С. 30–31.
3. Liebenberg W.H. Chairside-fabricated indirect resin restorations: a new articulated technique.
/ Liebenberg // Quintessence Int. – 1997. – С. 499–507.
4. Photoelastic analysis of inlay and onlay preparations / D.W. Fisher, A.A. Caputo,
H.T. Shillingburg Jr., M.G. Duncanson Jr. // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 1975. – С. 47–53.
5. Lopes L.M. Effect of a new resin inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement /
L.M. Lopes, J.G. Leitao, W.H. Douglas. // Quintessence Int.. – 1991. – №22. – С. 641–5.
6. Hopp C.D. Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review / C.D. Hopp,
M.F. Land. // Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. – 2013. – № 5. – С. 21–32.
7. Garber D.A. Porcelain & composite inlays & onlays: esthetic posterior restorations /
D.A. Garber, R.E. Goldstein. – Michigan: Quintessence Pub. Co., 1994. – 159 с. – (Quintessence
books). – (0867151714, 9780867151718)
8. Dietschi D. Adhesive Metal-free Restorations: Current Concepts for the Esthetic Treatment
of Posterior Teeth / D. Dietschi, R. Spreafico. – Michigan: Quintessence Publishing, 1997. – 215 с. –
(0867153288, 9780867153286).
9. Fracture strength and fatigue resistance of all-ceramic molar crowns manufactured
with CAD/CAM technology / M. Zahran, O. El-Mowafy, L. Tam et al. // Int J Prosthodont. – 2008. –
17 (5). – P. 370–377.
10. Bindl A. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years –
preliminary results / A. Bindl, W.H. Mцrmann // J. Adhes. Dent. – 1999. – 1 (3). – P. 255–65.
11. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique /
P. Pissis // Pract. Periodontics Aesthet. Dent. – 1995. – 7 (5). – P. 83–94.
12. Capturing motions and forces of the human masticatory system to replicate chewing and
to perform dental wear experiments / D. Raabe, A.J.L. Harrison, A.J. Ireland et al. // Proc. of the 24th
International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS 2011). – IEEE Catalog Number
CFP11CBM-ART, 2011. – P. 1–6.
13. Wiskott H.W. Stress fatigue: basic principles and prosthodontic implications /
H.W. Wiskott, J.I. Nicholls, U.C. Belser // Int. J. Prosthodontics. – 1995. – 8 (2).– P. 105–116.
14. All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability
and fracture resistance after fatigue / C.F. Stappert, P.C. Guess, T. Gerds et al. // Am. J. Dent. –
2005. – 18(4). – P. 275–280.
15. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading
and fracture resistance / C.F. Stappert, P.C. Guess, S.T. Chitmongkolsuk et al. // Am. J. Dent. –
2007. – 20 (1). – P. 21–26.
16. Fatigue behaviour of dental composite materials / J.L. Drummond, L. Lin, L.A. Al-Turki
Ryan et al. // J. Dent. – 2009. – 37 (5). – P. 321–330.
17. Clausen J.O. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage
molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design / J.O. Clausen,
T.M. Abou, M. Kern // Dent. Mater. – 2010. – 26 (6). – P. 533–538.
18. Compressive fatigue limit of four types of dental restorative materials / S. Chen,
C. Öhman, S.R. Jefferies et al. // J. Mech. Behav. Boimed. Mater. – 2016. – 61. – P. 283–289.
19. Макєєв В.Ф. Вплив циклічного навантаження силою жувального тиску і вищою на
поверхню металокерамічних і прескерамічних ендокоронок / В.Ф. Макєєв, В.Р. Скальський,
Р.Р. Павличко // Современная стоматология. – 2018. – № 2. – С. 57–60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
