Динаміка клінічних показників після цистектомії з використанням електрозварювання країв прооперованої ділянки у пацієнтів з одонтогенними кістами щелеп

S. I. Chepyshko; O. O. Maksymiv

doi:10.33295/1992-576X-2022-1-2-52

Authors

S. I. Chepyshko Bukovina State Medical University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7008-0622
O. O. Maksymiv Bukovina State Medical University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4975-7031

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2022-1-2-52

Keywords:

odontogenic cyst, cystectomy, electric welding of tissues, postoperative complications

Abstract

Goal. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method of cystectomy using electric welding on the basis of the obtained clinical and biochemical parameters.
Materials and methods. Cystectomy was performed in 87 patients: 20 patients – 1 control group (classical surgical method), 28 patients – 2 control groups (cystectomy using laser technology) and 39 patients – the main group (cystectomy using electric welding).
Results. The use of electric welding technology during cystectomy allowed to reduce and facilitate the postoperative period in patients of the main group up to 5 days in contrast to patients in other groups, in which symptoms of inflammation and pain were observed up to 14 days.
Conclusions. The use of electric welding of tissues during cystectomy in the oral cavity allowed to achieve sterility of the operated area, reduce the intervention time, and due to the absence of foreign bodies in the wound to reduce and facilitate postoperative rehabilitation of patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

S. I. Chepyshko, Bukovina State Medical University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine

Head of the Dental Department of the University Clinic Educational and Medical Center, Bukovina State Medical University

O. O. Maksymiv, Bukovina State Medical University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Therapeutic Dentistry, Director of the “University Clinic” Educational and Treatment Center

References

Belousov A.E. Rubtsы kak hlobalnaia problema plastycheskoi khyrurhyy // Annalы plastycheskoi, rekonstruktyvnoi y эstetycheskoi khyrurhyy. – 2004; 4: 41–2.

Bukhanchenko O.P. Dyferentsiina diahnostyka patolohichnykh rubtsiv shkiry, shcho lokalizovani v riznykh diliankakh holovy ta shyi [dysertatsiia]. – Poltava; 2020. – 205 s.

Vazyna A.A., Lanyna N.F., Marynskyi H.V., Podpriatov S.E., Hychka S.H., Chernets A.V. y dr. Vlyianye vыsokochastotnoi эlektrokhyrurhycheskoi svarky na funktsyonalnuiu ustoichyvost strukturы byolohycheskykh tkanei. V: Yvanova O.N., redaktor. Materyalы shestoho mezhdunar. semynara «Svarka miahkykh zhyvыkh tkanei. Sovremennoe sostoianye y perspektyvы razvytyia; 2011, dek. 2–3; Kyev. – Kyev: YЭS ym. E.O. Patona; 2011, s. 53.

Handыlian K.S., Karpov S.M., Romanenko Y.P., Karakov K.H., Zelenskyi V.A., Porfyryadys M.P. y dr. Ostrыe odontohennыe vospalytelnыe zabolevanyia, varyantы techenyia razlychnыkh klynycheskykh form // Medytsynskyi vestnyk Severnoho Kavkaza. – 2015; 4: 394–8.

Markevych V.F., Khutorianskyi M.O, Vilchaniuk O.O. Morfolohichnyi ta morfometrychnyi analiz reaktsii tkanyn na implantatsiiu riznykh vydiv shovnoho materialu // Ukrainskyi morfolohichnyi almanakh. – 2013; 11 (4): 44–9.

Panyn A.M., Kym L.E., Yurkevych R.Y. Khyrurhycheskaia reabylytatsyia patsyentov s radykuliarnыmy kystamy cheliustei // Pallyatyvnaia medytsyna y reabylytatsyia. 2015; 1: 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12480-015-0142-5

Podpriatov S.Ie., Hychka S.H., Podpriatov S.S., Marynskyi H.S., Tkachenko V.A., Chernets O.V. Struktura elektrozvarnoho shva yak osnova novoho rozvytku khirurhii // Klinichna khirurhiia.

Soloveva E.P., Muslymov S.A., Musyna L.A., Lebedeva A.Y. Reaktsyia na allohennыi y syntetycheskyi shovnыi materyalы: rezultatы morfolohycheskoho yssledovanyia // Medytsynskyi vestnyk Bashkortostana. – 2014; 9 (5): 90–1.

Stoian E.Iu., Denysova E.H., Sokolova Y.Y. Tsystэktomyia – sovremennыe aspektы problemы // Visnyk stomatolohii. – 2018; 2: 50–4.

Bourdel N., Chauvet P., Roman H., Pereira B., Somcutian O., Dechelotte P.J. et al. Comparison between resection, bipolar coagulation and Plasmajet®: A preliminary animal study // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. – 2017; 211: 127–33. (Porivniannia mizh rezektsiieiu, bipoliarnoiu koahuliatsiieiu ta та Plasmajet®). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.02.004 PMid:28242472

Convissar R.A. Laser Dentistry in 2020: Technology Excels While Training Has Flaws // Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. – 2020; 41 (1): 50–3.

Dostalova T., Jelinkova H. Laser in dentistry: overview and perspectives // Photomed. Laser Surg. – 2013; 31 (4): 147–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2013.3493 PMid:23489442

Dragovic M., Pejovic M., Stepic J., Colic S., Dozic B., Dragovic S. et al. Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features-randomized clinical study // Clin. Oral. Investig. – 2020; 24 (4): 1527–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03034-4 PMid:31342245

Hong B., Winkel A., Ertl P., Stumpp S.N., Schwabe K., Stiesch M. et al. Bacterial colonisation of suture material after routine neurosurgical procedures: relevance for wound infection // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). – 2018; 160 (3): 497–503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3404-9 PMid:29189910

Kammer P.V., Mello F.W., Rivero E.R.C. Comparative analysis between developmental and inflammatory odontogenic cysts: retrospective study and literature review // Oral Maxillofac. Surg. – 2020; 24 (1): 73–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-019-00816-8 PMid:31858303